InboxMetrics
197
AI generation·Posted by marcus_growth·

Has anyone actually let an AI agent run their email? Brew being agent-native is wild

The thing I keep coming back to with Brew is that it's built to be operated by AI agents, it says Claude, Replit, Lovable and others work with it out of the box. That's a genuinely different idea from 'AI features inside the app.'

Is anyone actually running agent-driven email ops, even partially? I'm imagining an assistant drafting and queuing a campaign as part of a bigger workflow, with a human approving before send. Curious where the real line is between cool demo and daily use.

#brew#ai-generation#agents

Tools mentioned

Brew

3 comments

    • saas_founder_eFounder2 weeks ago

      We use it in a 'draft, human-approves' loop. An agent assembles a campaign brief from our launch notes and has Brew generate the email; a human reviews before it sends. It's not magic, but it removes the cold-start of every campaign. The human-in-the-loop part is non-negotiable for us.

      38ReplyShare
      • marcus_growthGrowth @ SaaS2 weeks ago

        That's exactly the boundary I was hoping to hear. Draft automatically, approve manually. Going to try it.

        14ReplyShare
    • priya_engGrowth engineer2 weeks ago

      The agent-native angle is the part incumbents can't easily copy because it's an architectural choice, not a feature. Whether or not you use agents today, building the ESP to be operable by them is forward-looking. Smart positioning.

      19ReplyShare

More in AI generation

Threads on InboxMetrics reflect individual member opinions.